Last week I had the privilege of being part of a team for a 6-day design charrette that kicked off a community visioning process for the District of Sechelt.
What is a charrette, you ask? Well, according to Wikipedia, it can be any collaborative session in which a group of designers drafts a solution to a design problem. In urban planning, "the charrette has become a technique for consulting with all stakeholders. Such charrettes typically involve intense, possibly multi-day meetings involving municipal officials, developers and local residents, …[and] promote joint ownership of solutions."
That's a pretty good description of what we did in Sechelt. Our session included several community meetings, two days of one-on-one interviews, and many hours spent distilling the information and classifying it into major themes. The results were then translated by the architect/planners on our team into sketches illustrating possible directions Sechelt might want to consider, and presented back to the community for feedback and refinement.
The project was headed up by my pal John Talbot (see below for an earlier job I did with him), and included his associate John Stark, four architect/planners, and moi as the graphic recorder. Talk about dream teams — I can't imagine a nicer, more supportive, more creative group of people — or more fun! (Ask the staff at the Blue Heron Inn, where we convulsed ourselves and the staff with our, um, high spirits!) As I said to John, if work was always this much fun, everyone would be thrilled to go to work each day. I feel very lucky to be doing work I love with people I love to work with.
Speaking of which, here's what I did at the charrette. Below are the left- and right-hand sides of a piece illustrating the results of interviews with high school students about what they liked and disliked about Sechelt, and their ideas for the future (click on any picture for a larger view):
And here's the piece I put together to illustrate the major themes coming out of the meetings and interviews:
(Sorry about the less-than-brilliant photography. I'm still learning to use my digital camera and haven't mastered the settings yet — and the lighting was too uneven to clean up in Photoshop as I did with the other two. I'm hoping to be able to rephotograph the image and touch it up properly.)
All in all, it was a wonderful and intense experience, and a great learning experience for me. Keep 'em coming!
This is your faithful scribe after the final meeting, where I did live recording of feedback from the participants (as opposed to after-the-fact recording, which the others were). Live work definitely keeps you on your toes, because there isn't much time to think. The trick, I believe, is to hone your listening skills to the point where you just know what needs to be recorded and what doesn't. I'm still trying to get down everything I hear! Well, it'll all come with practice...
Monday, October 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Avril, I couldn't find your email on your blog. I'm involved with the BC Centre for Quality here in the Lower Mainland. I'm also an enthusiastic admirer of the contribution of graphic facilitation to the organization's journey. We attract members and paricipants from many different organizations with programs, monthly meetings, events, workshops etc.
ReplyDeleteI would love to show the impact of graphic facilitation to our membership. Would you contact me ann@bccq.org and we could explire some possibilities? It sounds like you are really busy so I will need to plan ahead!
Loved the work and the blog,
Ann